Progress
Toward Identification and Cleanup of Endocrine Disruptors from California
Watersheds.
D. Michael Fry*,
MS Denison, B Puschner, ML Johnson, I Werner, and SJ Teh.
*Department of
Animal Science, University of California
There are two basic
approaches to identification and monitoring of endocrine disrupting substances
in the environment. The USGS has initiated a monitoring program of US
rivers and other surface waters for "emerging pollutants", which
include antibiotics, hormones, and pharmaceuticals. 95 chemicals are being
monitored, including 17 chemicals and hormones that have the potential
of disrupting reproductive hormones or development. The monitoring program
has the ability to identify levels of these endocrine disruptors in watersheds,
but the program does not directly address the activity of any other compounds,
or the potential for endocrine disruptive activity as side effects of
other chemicals in the environment.
We have developed
an alternative strategy to collect and screen water samples for hormonal
activity (estrogenic, anti-estrogenic, androgenic, and anti-androgenic),
and identify the active chemicals in water samples. The program is also
designed to identify unknown chemicals with endocrine disruptive activity,
and will quantify the activity levels in surface water samples, to ultimately
provide guidance on risk of surface waters to humans, fish and wildlife.
The program is a
four step set of analyses: 1) Water sampling and determination of hormonal
activity relative to estradiol or testosterone in reference binding assays;
2) Identification and quantification of the presumptive active chemical(s)
in the sample;
3) Hormonal activity and developmental testing of identified chemicals
in a fish test species (Gambusia affinis) common throughout California
watersheds; and 4) Comparison of the hormonal activity of the identified
chemical with watershed environmental levels, to determine the risk posed
to drinking water and fish.
About 1000 water
samples from central California waters will be tested each year. Water
sampling will be conducted using a protocol similar to that of Snyder
et al. (2001a,b), in which 5 liter water samples are pumped through solid
phase extraction cartridges or disks in the field. Each sample cartridge/disk
will be identified in the field with a bar-code label, with data entered
into a GPS database in a laptop computer in the field.
Extracts of each
sample will be tested for hormonal activity using a recombinant human
ovarian carcinoma (BG-1) cell line (called BG1Luc4E2 cells) that contains
a stably transfected estrogen-responsive firefly luciferase reporter gene.
These cells respond in a time, dose and chemical specific manner-dependent
manner to 17ßestradiol and related xenoestrogens (including o'p'-DDT,
methoxychlor, kepone, bisphenol a, and nonylphenol) with up to a 100-fold
induction of luciferase activity. In addition, this cell bioassay is extremely
sensitive, with a lower limit of detection of at least 0.1 pM of estradiol
(Rogers and Denison 2000). In addition to estrogenic activity, we will
also examine the androgenic activity of the same samples using a recombinant
prostate cell line (LNCaP) that has been transiently transfected with
an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene.
Up to 50 of the highest
activity water sample extracts will be analyzed each year by one or several
analytical techniques and the chemical(s) present will be identified by
mass spectroscopy, and compared to analytical standards. The hormonal
activity of the identified chemicals will be confirmed in the cell culture
assays using analytical grade compounds.
We will select the
most significant compounds for fish analysis. We plan to conduct toxicological
assessments with 12-15 compounds during the first 3 years. We anticipate
that a larger number of hormone active chemicals will be identified in
the watershed than will be possible to be tested on Gambusia, because
of the time and labor-intensive nature of the fish screening and biomarker
assays. Gambusia will be exposed to analytical grade compounds using the
techniques adapted from the study of Koger, Teh, and Hinton (2000) examining
gonadal morphology, fertility, and embryo/larval viability. The numbers
of live young, sex ratios of surviving progeny, and histological evaluation
of gonads will be used as markers of reproductive function. Detection
of the specific protein biomarkers vitellogenin and choriogenin will be
used as biomarkers for detecting hormonal activity in adult Gambusia.
The dose response
information gathered from the fish exposure studies will be compared to
the environmental concentrations of active chemicals in the watershed,
to determine the environmental health risk for fish and drinking water.
For agricultural chemicals, the water sample locations will be compared
with the Department of Pesticide Regulation use reports to identify other
likely hot spots within the watershed.