Environmental Monitoring and Governance

Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Water
Manual for Sample Collection and Analysis
January 2003
II. Overview of UNU’s Previous Activities
IV. Sample Collection and Preparation for Analysis
3. Target
compounds (Pesticides for POPs)
4. Internal
Standard compound (IS) and Surrogate compound
5. Reagents,
Materials and Apparatus
6. Sample
for Calibration Curve
7. Summary
of Method for Preparation (Flow chart)
3. Analysis
of Recovery Test (100ng/L)
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) are chemical substances that persist in the environment, bioaccumulate through the food web, and pose a risk of causing adverse effects to human population and the environment. There has been a realization that these pollutants, upon exposure of human population, can cause serious health effects ranging from increased incidence of cancers to disruption of hormonal system. These effects have also been observed and recorded for various animal species. Developing countries are particularly vulnerable due to often indiscriminate use and disposal of POPs.
There is also significant evidence that there is long-range transport of these substances to regions where they have never been used or produced. The obvious ramification is that POPs pose threats to the environment of the whole globe, and therefore, the international community has focused on global actions to reduce and eliminate releases of these chemicals. It is now internationally acknowledged that Arctic ecosystems and indigenous communities are particularly at risk because of the biomagnification of POPs in the food chain and contamination of traditional foods in the Tundra region is a public health issue.
An equally important issue is to identify future actions needed to minimize and prevent entry of POPs into the environment. This includes re-thinking production processes and utilization of chemicals in various manufacturing activities. It is also critical to develop adequate methodologies for disposal of wastes that contain POPs. Implementing any such remediation approaches in developing countries would likely entail considerable capacity development and technology transfer.
There has been a significant level of debate
on these issues at the international level, particularly during the 1990’s.
This has culminated in the development of the Stockholm Convention On Persistent Organic Pollutants on
The East Asian region has also been actively involved in the POPs debate. However, there is still a need for developing extensive database of the level of POPs in various compartments of the environment. In its previous activities since 1996, UNU has targeted the monitoring of many POPs compounds. This project builds on the previous work and compiled database of POPs, to launch a comprehensive set of monitoring activities linked closely to thematic discussions on environmental quality. This can lead to concrete mechanisms for identifying existing and impending threats from POPs.
2.1 1996-1999 “Environmental
Monitoring and Analysis in the East Asian Region”
UNU led the project: ‘Environmental
Monitoring and Analysis in the East Asian Region’ since 1996 under a three-year
programme. This project was primarily sponsored by Shimadzu Corporation. The
countries/territories involved were:
During the first year of the project, the
primary emphasis was on evaluating pesticide contamination in foods. Rice was
selected as the representative crop due to its widespread use as staple of the
diet in the East Asian region. Additionally, soil samples were also analyzed to
establish a correlation between soil and rice contamination. During the second
year of the project, the monitoring emphasis was on water contamination. For
this purpose, tap water samples were collected to evaluate the quality of
drinking water in
2.2 1999-2002 “Environmental
Monitoring and Governance in the East Asian Coastal Hydrosphere”
This project contained three major components: (1) Environmental Monitoring and Governance - EDC Pollution in the East Asian Coastal Hydrosphere; (2) Cooperative International Research Project on Marine and Coastal Environment; and (3) Asia-Pacific Cooperation On Research And Conservation Of Mangroves. The three components were closely linked together and implemented with collaboration of the UNU network on coastal issues.
The first component: EDC Pollution in the
East Asian Coastal Hydrosphere was managed with close cooperation and major
funding from Shimadzu Corporation. The project collected data regarding
presence of endocrine disruptor compounds (EDCs) in
the coastal hydrosphere. This information was used to develop consistent and
rational guidelines for coastal management programmes in
During the first year of the project, DDT and its breakdown components were monitored by all the participating organizations. In addition, several other pesticides were also reported. During the second year of the project additional pollutants were included in the list of those monitored; these were primarily alkylphenols and bisphenol-A. In the third year, a new group comprising various phthalates was added.
2.3
Outcomes of the Previous Project Activities
The previous project activities have resulted in generating reliable environmental data in the East Asian region as well as capacity building in the participant laboratories. The data generated as part of this project have gone through a quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) process jointly overseen by Shimadzu and UNU. This has led to confidence in the information provided by these data.
The benefits of the project can be briefly summarized as:
§ Providing technical support for environmental monitoring
§ Training of young professionals in environmental monitoring techniques
3.1
Focus & Objective
The main focus of the project is on monitoring of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in rivers and fresh water bodies close to the coastal areas. The objective is to develop an early-warning system to counter and minimize environmental pollution; this will be achieved through periodic and systematic monitoring.
3.2
Participating Institutions
3.3 Project Components:
A.
B.
Environmental Monitoring
C.
Information Dissemination
3.4
Project Output
The benefits of the project can be briefly summarized as:
a. Continued collaboration of the existing network of professionals
b. Capacity building in participating developing countries for environmental monitoring
c. Development of an early-warning capacity in the region against environmental pollution to water bodies
d.
Generation of reliable data on
water quality and pollution sources in
e. Training of young professionals in environmental monitoring techniques
f. Awareness-raising in participating countries through meetings and publications
g. Development of environmental management approaches to control pollution sources
QA/QC is very important, and necessary for the analysis.
Fig. 1 shows the Flow Chart of the analysis.
Flow chart 1 : from set up GC/MS to end
Flow chart 2 : the case of calibration curve has made yet
1. Set up GC/MS
2. Check GC/MS using software “System check” and Auto tuning
3. Analyze standard sample (1ppm).
Check Mass Spectra, Retention Time, Sensitivity (Peak height), Profile of Peak, Decomposion of Pesticides
4. Analyze blank sample (n-Hexane)
5. Make the calibration curve of pesticides
Check the calibration curve
6. Analyze standard sample (10ppb) at several times (minimum 5 times)
Check the detection limit
7. Analyze the monitoring sample
After the analysis of 20 samples
8. Analyze standard sample (10ppb)
Check Retention Time, Sensitivity (Peak height), Profile of Peak
9. End of analysis
Allowance
Retention time less 0.1min
Peak height less 20%
Profile of peak tailing factor
Repeatability CV(%) less 10%
Blank less 1ppb

Fig.1 QA/QC Flow Chart
2.1
Water Sample
The water samples will be collected from rivers or coastal areas. The sample collection and analysis methods are the same for both freshwater and seawater samples.
The water sample will be collected as close to the surface as possible. In the case of river water samples, the sample should be collected in the middle of the stream.
The water sample will be collected in a glass container and the volume to be collected is 10 liters. It is preferable to store the sample in ice and away from sunlight during shipment to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the sample should be stored in a refrigerator at all times.
The form for recording sample collection is provided in Appendix 1.
2.2
QA/QC Sample
The samples for QA/QC are diluted by 1000times with the mineral water. Then they are taken the same preparation, and analysis as the water samples.
The target compounds are :
1. Aldrin
2. Dieldrin
3. Endrin
4. Chlordane
5. Heptachlor
6. Hexachlorobenzene
7. p,p’-DDT
The following compounds will be used as internal standard and surrogate compounds for the GC/MS operation.
1. Pyrene - d10 (Internal Standard compound)
2. p,p’-DDT-13C12 (Surrogate compound)
The following reagents are required for the analysis:
1. NaCl
2. N-Hexane
3. Na2SO4 (anhyd)
4. Acetone
5. Standard stock solutions (100ppm: 100mg/L)
Dissolve 10mg of each Pesticides with 100ml of Acetone + n-Hexane
Stock at a refrigerator
6. Surrogate stock solutions (100ppm: 100mg/L)
Dissolve 10mg of Surrogate Compound with 100ml of n-Hexane
Stock at a refrigerator
7. Internal standard stock solutions (100ppm: 100mg/L)
Dissolve 10mg of Internal Standard Compound with 100ml of Acetone
Stock at a refrigerator
The following equipments are required for sample preparation and analysis:
1. Separating funnel
2. Rotary evaporator
3. Florisil Cartridge (Bond
Standard solution Ⅰ (1ppm: 1mg/L)
100μl of Standard stock solution (100ppm) and Surrogate stock solution (100ppm) are injected into 10ml of n-Hexane.
Standard solution Ⅱ (100ppb: 100ng/ml)
10μl of Standard stock solution (100ppm) and Surrogate stock solution (100ppm) are injected into 10ml of n-Hexane.
Standard solution Ⅲ (50ppb: 50ng/ml)
5ml of 100ppb solution is injected into 10ml of n-Hexane.
Standard solution Ⅳ (10ppb: 10ng/ml)
1ml of 100ppb solution is injected into 10ml of n-Hexane.
Standard solution Ⅴ (5ppb: 5ng/ml)
1ml of 50ppb solution is injected into 10ml of n-Hexane.
Standard solution Ⅵ (1ppb: 1ng/ml)
1ml of 10ppb solution is injected into 10ml of n-Hexane.
Internal standard solution Ⅰ (
100μl of Internal standard stock solution (100ppm) is injected into 1ml of
n-Hexane.
Surrogate standard solution Ⅰ (2ppm: 2mg/ml)
2μl of Surrogate standard stock solution (100ppm) is injected into 1ml of
n-Hexane.
Inject 5μl of Internal standard solution Ⅰ (10ppm) into 1ml of each solutionⅡ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ,Ⅴ,
Make the calibration curves of each Pesticides and Surrogate compound using the internal standard method.
The following flow chart provides an overview of the method required for sample preparation prior to GC/MS analysis.
|
Water (1L) |
|
|
|
↓ ↓ |
← ← |
NaCl 30g Surrogate Compound 100μl 2ppm |
|
↓ |
← |
n-Hexane 50ml |
|
Extraction by shaking |
|
|
|
↓ |
← |
Na2SO4
(anhyd) about 3g |
|
Dehydration |
|
|
|
↓ |
|
|
|
Concentration |
1ml by rotary evaporator
and N2 gas |
|
|
↓ |
|
|
|
Clean up |
Florisil chromatography |
|
|
↓ |
|
|
|
Concentration |
1ml by N2 gas
|
|
|
↓ |
← |
IS 5μl
10ppm |
|
Mess up |
n-Hexane to 1ml |
|
|
↓ |
|
|
|
Analysis by GCMS |
2μl
injection |
|
The following steps should be followed in preparing the sample for analysis:
1. Add 1L of river water into 2L of separating funnel
2. Add 30g of NaCl into separating funnel
3. Add 100μl 2ppm of Surrogate compound into separating funnel (Refer to step 1)
4. Add 50ml of n-Hexane into separating funnel
5. Shaking it for 10 min. for extraction
6. Transfer n- Hexane from separating funnel
7. Add 50ml of n-Hexane into water layer
8. Shaking it for 10 min. for extraction
9. Transfer n- Hexane from separating funnel into flask
10. Add about 3g of Na2SO4 (anhyd) into n-Hexane layer for dehydration
11. Stay for 20 min.
12. Condense to less 1ml by Rotary Evaporator and N2 gas
13. Transfer n-Hexane layer into tube
14. Flow n-Hexane layer into Florisil column (Refer 2)
15. Flow 7ml of 2% Acetone/n-Hexane
16. Condense to less 1ml by N2 gas
17. Add 5μl of 10ppm IS (Refer 3)
18. Measure 1ml by n-Hexane
19. Inject 2μl to GCMS
Refer 1 Surrogate standard solution
2ppm of p,p’-DDT-13C12
Refer 2 Method of Column
Wash Florisil Column by 5ml of Acetone and 15ml of n-Hexane
Refer 3 Internal Standard solution
10ppm of Pyrene-d10
Notice
It is necessary to check an insert at GC injection port before analysis of pesticides.
If the insert is dirty, p,p'-DDT is decomposed.(Show Fig. 6.)
When peaks appear, you must change a new insert.
--- GC ---
Column DB-1 30m 0.32mm ID 0.25μm df
Column Temp. 70℃ (1min.)-20℃/min.-130℃-5℃/min.-210℃-
15℃/min.-300℃ (4min.)
He Liner Velocity
Pressure 49.9kPa
Total Flow 44.9ml/min
Column Flow 2.32ml/min
Liner Velocity 55cm/sec
Purge Flow 10.0ml/min
Split Ratio 14.0
Injection port Temp. 250℃
Injection Method Spritless (1min.)
Injection Volume 2μl
--- MS ---
Ion Source Temp. 230℃
Interface Temp. 270℃
Scanning Range m/z 35 ~ 500
Scanning Interval 0.5sec.
SIM Sampling Rate 0.2sec.
|
|
Compounds |
M/Z |
|||
|
1 |
Hexachlorobenzene |
283.9 |
285.9 |
248.9 |
|
|
2 |
Heptachlor |
100.0 |
271.9 |
336.9 |
|
|
3 |
Aldrin |
262.9 |
264.9 |
292.9 |
|
|
4 |
trans-Chlordane |
374.8 |
372.8 |
407.85 |
|
|
5 |
Cis-Chlordane |
374.8 |
372.8 |
407.85 |
|
|
6 |
Dieldrin |
262.9 |
278.9 |
379.85 |
242.9 |
|
7 |
Endrin |
262.9 |
278.9 |
242.9 |
316.9 |
|
8 |
p,p'- DDT |
235.0 |
237.0 |
165.0 |
|
|
IS |
Pyrene-d10 |
212.1 |
106.0 |
|
|
|
Surrogate |
p,p'- DDT-13C12 |
247.0 |
249.0 |
224.0 |
|
Add 100μl of Standard Sample Ⅱ(1ppm) into 1L of pure water (mineral water)
Take same preparation and analyze
|
|
Compounds |
M/Z |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Average |
Deviation |
CV(%) |
|
1 |
Hexachlorobenzene |
283.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Heptachlor |
271.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Aldrin |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
trans-Chlordane |
374.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
cis-Chlordane |
374.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Dieldrin |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Endrin |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
p,p'- DDT |
235.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS |
Pyrene-d10 |
248.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Surr |
p,p'- DDT-13C12 |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyze 2μl of Standard Sample Ⅴ(5ng/ml)
|
|
Compounds |
M/Z |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Average |
Deviation |
CV(%) |
|
1 |
Hexachlorobenzene |
283.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Heptachlor |
271.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Aldrin |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
trans-Chlordane |
374.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
cis-Chlordane |
374.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Dieldrin |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Endrin |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
p,p'- DDT |
235.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS |
Pyrene-d10 |
248.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surr |
p,p'- DDT-13C12 |
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 1 QA/QC Flow Chart
Fig. 2-1 TIC of Pesticides (1ppm)
Fig. 2-2 TIC of Pesticides (1ppm)
Fig. 3-1 SIM of Pesticides (100ppb)
Fig. 3-2 SIM of Pesticides (70ppb)
Fig. 3-3 SIM of Pesticides (50ppb)
Fig. 3-4 SIM of Pesticides (25ppb)
Fig. 3-5 SIM of Pesticides (10ppb)
Fig. 3-6 SIM of Pesticides (5ppb)
Fig. 3-7 SIM of Pesticides (0ppb)
Fig. 4-1 Calibration Curve of Pesticides (0~100ppb)
Fig. 4-2 Calibration Curve of Pesticides (0~500ppb)
Fig. 5 SIM of River Water Sample
Fig. 6-1 TIC of p,p'-DDT by good system
Fig. 6-2 TIC of p,p'-DDT by bad system
Table 1 Recovery of Pesticides (100ppb)
Table 2 Repeatability of Pesticides (5ppb)
Table 3 Results of River Water Sample

Fig.1-1 TIC and Mass Spectra of Pesticides

Fig.1-2 TIC and Mass Spectra of Pesticides

Fig. 3-1 SIM of Pesticides (100ng/ml)
Fig. 3-2 SIM of Pesticides (70ng/ml)

Fig. 3-3 SIM of Pesticides (50ng/ml)

Fig. 3-4 SIM of Pesticides (25ppb)

Fig. 3-5 SIM of Pesticides (10ng/ml)

Fig. 3-6 SIM of Pesticides (5ng/ml)

Fig. 3-7 SIM of Pesticides (0ng/ml)

Fig. 4-1 Calibration Curve of Pesticides (0~100ng/ml)

Fig. 4-2 Calibration Curve of Pesticides (0~500ng/ml)
Table 1 Recovery of Pesticides (100ppb)

Table 2 Repeatability of Pesticides (5ppb)


Fig. 5 SIM of River Water Sample
Table 3 Results of River Water Sample
|
River
Water 1L -> 1ml |
|
|
|
|
Value
for GCMS (ng/ml) |
River conc. (μg/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hexachlorobenzene |
No Peak |
- |
|
Heptachlor |
No Peak |
- |
|
Aldrin |
No Peak |
- |
|
trans-Chlordane |
No Peak |
- |
|
cis-Chlordane |
No Peak |
- |
|
Dieldrin |
No Peak |
- |
|
Endrin |
No Peak |
- |
|
p,p'-DDT |
No Peak |
- |
|
p,p'-DDT-13C12 |
Recovery 89.458% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
River
Water 1L (Add 50ng) -> 1ml |
|
|
|
|
Value
for GCMS (ng/ml) |
River conc. (μg/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hexachlorobenzene |
43.447 |
0.043 |
|
Heptachlor |
44.481 |
0.044 |
|
Aldrin |
43.969 |
0.044 |
|
trans-Chlordane |
50.051 |
0.050 |
|
cis-Chlordane |
49.113 |
0.049 |
|
Dieldrin |
44.698 |
0.045 |
|
Endrin |
46.195 |
0.046 |
|
p,p'-DDT |
48.398 |
0.048 |
|
p,p'-DDT-13C12 |
Recovery 92.629% |
|

Fig. 6-1 TIC of p,p’-DDT by good system

Fig. 6-2 TIC of p,p’-DDT by bad system